99% of CPG (Consumer Packaged Goods) firms are investing in Direct To Consumer (DTC) sales models according to Salesforce research cited in Retail Week & Edge by Ascential‘s recent report. It describes a massively accelerated shift to DTC due to C19, evidenced by Nike forecasting $16bn of DTC sales this year and Adidas saying that 60% of its sales are now made through direct retail. And less high price ticket firms are also doing the same, including Kraft Heinz, Unilever & BrewDog.
FMCG firms trying to build direct relationships with consumers means facing new or radically altered challenges in data, pricing, customer service & logistics, to name just a few.
Brands will need outside expertise & experience to ensure they exploit these new opportunities, not make unnecessary mistakes & end up as dependent on Amazon as they used to be on 20th century retailers.
It seems that Information Commissioner’s Office‘s updated Direct Marketing Code of Practice won’t be released until well into 2021. Originally due this year, the ICO has now told the DMA‘s John Mitchison that the new Code will be “significantly delayed”
The draft Code the ICO circulated as part of its consultation exercise earlier this year apparently created a bigger response than just about any similar exercise by the ICO.
Maybe that’s not surprising. The Code is the nearest thing people in the sales, marketing & customer experience worlds will get to practical, contextual guidance and rules from the ICO. The underlying legislation is there in the GDPR and the 2018 Data Protection Act, but most of us have better things to do with our time that trawl through statute law wishing we had studied for a law degree.
And the Code gives a direct insight into how the ICO will interpret the law; we all have opinions, but the regulator’s are the most important!
So, what does this mean for businesses focused on acquiring, retaining and servicing customers in tempestuous times?
In a couple of days I’ll post my thoughts.
You need 2 trainers to deliver an effective remote training course. Many organisations are cheerfully banking Covid cost savings from having a largely or wholly home-based workforce. But this isn’t a one-way street, as my good friend and gifted trainer, Darren Laskier, explained to me last week.
Training online should allow more participants per course, but also means that their involvement & engagement needs active encouragement. This can be achieved through chat; asking for and encouraging questions, comments & clarifications. However, monitoring & responding is a job in itself and doing so – and ensuring that the feedback from the floor is captured & reflected in the content being delivered – requires a second person. Alternatively, the larger group could break out into virtual syndicate groups. This can be very effective at fostering engagement and reinforcing learnings, but requires multiple facilitators.
Good trainers have – like all of us – adapted to different ways of working over the past few months. And in some senses remote training delivery can offer advantages over a traditional approach, but at a cost.
These are tough times for most firms, but cutting the L&D budget could be doubling damaging if training’s being done remotely!
This week’s statistic is remarkable just because it’s shouldn’t be a surprise. For once it shows that brands and customers are thinking the same way about service and #customerexperience.
According to ContactBabel‘s typically detailed ‘The UK Customer Experience Decision-Makers’ Guide 2020-21’ report, not only do 53% of B2C organisations’ decision makers rank First Time Resolution as the most important of 8 factors for customers contacting them, but so do 57% of those customers too. In a world of excessive “inside out” thinking about customer service and a lack of attention to what customers actually want, this congruence is refreshing.
But it’s only a start.
Customer queries get more complex and their contact channels more varied all the time. To be able to understand and solve challenging questions – and better still, anticipate and negate them – needs a rare combination of data, insight, technology and old-fashioned empathy.
If you would like to talk through how to meet that challenge, just get in touch.
I don’t know and I don’t suppose you ever can be sure without the benefit of hindsight.
So, I was interested to see that 53% of the respondents to Ipsos CX & Awards International‘s ‘CX Voices: 2020’ survey said that since the start of #covıd19 their organisations’ focus on CX had increased.
It would be nice to think that in the face of unprecedented disruption and the deepest recession we have ever known that more than half of businesses were spending more energy focusing on #customerexperience, but I doubt it.
Remember the GDPR? Over 2 years on, we’ve done a quick bit of research into the Information Commissioner’s Office‘s sanctions and fines for sales and marketing. This has identified that in the ‘customer world’ it’s all about the old Privacy & Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) rules. Learn about PECR and how it impacts your customer communications in this infographic:
Stay Alert – Control Compliance – Save Fines!
This month’s headlines:
• Money Supermarket firm fined £90,000 for sending illegal marketing emails
• Privacy Shield goes the way of Safe Harbour and EU-US data transfers get a lot more tricky (which doesn’t bode well for Brexit Blighty)
• The ICO’s ‘GDPR era’ multi-million £ fines just get smaller and smaller…
• The Competition & Markets Authority sees no concerns as Amazon wades into the food delivery market (but highlights the dangers of middle aged men colluding in Wetherspoons)
• Shell’s loyalty scheme radio advertising banned for being insufficiently ‘carbon neutral’
• Dodgy ‘number look up’ site fined £1.1m for misleading consumers
Download it here:
Forget the GDPR, worry about PECR! What you really need to get right to avoid fines
This month’s headlines:
•Our research shows that 2 years on, it wasn’t the GDPR we should have been worried about, but PECR!
•Lloyds fined £64m by the FCA for not managing mortgage collections processes properly and fairly
•The Competition & Markets Authority tries to head off (another) digital advertising near-monopoly
•Ofcom advises consumers to avoid the Test & Trace scammers (who may be up & running before the government is) – and gives Vodafone some good news
•Energy suppliers can re-start debt collecting after a Covid pause – but to be nice, say Ofgem
•£1m fine for rip-off customer service number ‘look up’ sites
•Still not sure what you need to have in place for home-working? Here’s an article we wrote for the CCMA that should help
Download it here:
There’s no doubt that ‘gig CX’ is attracting a lot of attention (like home-working used to until one day in early April when most people woke up to find out that they were doing it!)
The Report makes for interesting reading. It shows that ‘gig CX’ is being used by mainstream brands like National Express, Sage & Unilever. And it also describes the range of activities that ‘gig CX’ encompasses, from brand enthusiast crowd-sourced communities to far more transactional home-based, paid-by-the-query models.
The potential impact of the former can be massive. I’m a GiffGaff customer and customer service is almost wholly delivered by mobile telephony obsessives, happily and for for free. A win-win-win for customers, community members and brands.
However, the home based transactional model has potential reputational dangers for brands. ‘Gig working’ might mean freedom and flexibility to some, but is redolent of exploitation and financial insecurity to others.
There is a great onus on employing brands and service providers to be confident they are recruiting the empowered and not the insecure.
The subscription (or membership) economy continues to thrive through #Covid19, according to research from Zuora in this report.
Although there is – unsurprisingly – contraction in subscription volumes in some sectors such as travel, 85% of subscription bases continue to grow. 20% of them at a quicker rate than pre-Covid (and that growth can’t all be down to Netflix and Zoom).
This shows that the shift to a rent-not-own consumption model is resilient, but as the report explains that is increasingly reliant on flexible, responsive pricing and service models.
The subscription economy is dependent on genuine, data-driven #customerengagement